The Ultimate Triumph of the Unitary Executive
A half century ago, a new and radical legal theory emerged. Now it is American law.

A half century ago, a new and radical legal theory emerged. Now it is American law.

The country is witnessing the creation of an all-powerful institution, and one man is responsible.

That’s not how separation of powers works under the U.S. Constitution.

The integrity of prosecution is an executive concern, but it’s a judicial one too.

Congress should act to protect directors of the various parts of the National Institutes of Health—of whom Anthony Fauci is one—from the wrath of the president.

The president’s administration is attempting to bring thousands of federal employees under his control, and the public is largely unaware.

I was part of a team that carefully developed a rule-making process in compliance with both the Constitution and Congress’s laws. Can the same be said now?

Even in defeat, the administration can’t stop trying to snow the public about a proposed citizenship question.

Presidents who want to shape the world unilaterally must face four inconvenient legal truths.

An upcoming case might show how the justices would react to the special counsel being dismissed.
