The Court’s Ballroom Decision Is a Sign of Deeper Problems
The conservative justices have separation of powers exactly backwards.

The conservative justices have separation of powers exactly backwards.

The Supreme Court is not saying people don’t have certain rights, just that no courts can help them when those rights are violated.

In Skrmetti, the Court turned to a decades-old decision once thought to be consigned to history.

The executive branch is relying on the language of the law as cover to claim that it is complying with court orders when in fact it is not.

This is a litigation strategy born of the first travel ban.

What was once constitutionally prohibited is now constitutionally required.

And the two parties—and the judges they have appointed—are on completely divergent legal paths.

The groundwork is now in place for major conservative wins in the years ahead.


In overturning the criminal convictions that resulted from the Bridgegate scandal, the Court is embracing a view of the world that is unbearably bleak.
