

Youâd be forgiven if you canât hum the 18th-century Cumbrian folk song âDo Ye Ken John Peel.â But in 1942, a version of that tune, reworked with lyrics about Pepsi-Cola, was the most recognized melody in America.
Three years earlier, two men walked into the office of Pepsi-Colaâs president, carrying a phonograph. They played a demo of what would become one of Americaâs earliest advertising jingles. To the tune of âDo Ye Ken John Peel,â it went: Pepsi-Cola hits the spot / Twelve full ounces, thatâs a lot / Twice as much for a nickel, too. Pepsi-Cola is the drink for you. The jingle became a hit. People played it on jukeboxes around the country; it was translated into 55 languages. Electronic chimes atop a Pepsi-Cola plant in New York rang the first seven notes on the half hour. Other companies recognized the power of hummable commercials, and there were soon so many on the radio that listeners complained. Eventually, The New York Timesâ radio station banned these âsinging commercials,â but companies could get around the ban by launching instrumental versions instead.
America has had a love-hate relationship with jingles since, but theyâve continued to provide paychecks for musicians. Most of the music industry is made up of people in the gray area between ârock starâ and âhobbyist,â like the session musicians and composers who make not just albums, but commercial soundtracks and jingles. When a report surfaced in October that OpenAI was developing a music-generation tool similar to products like Suno and Googleâs Lyria, I wasnât worried about the rock stars. These artists at least have their celebrity to trade on. But advertising musiciansâ work is usually anonymous, and you donât need to be Stravinsky to compose the 800-588-2300-EMPIRE tune. Are the jinglers going to be okay, or will advertising melodies be yet another livelihood cut down by new technology?
Jingle writing has become less of an art and more of a science over the past several decades. There are conventions now that did not exist in the âDo Ye Ken John Peelâ era, and conventions could make it easier for the work to be automated.
For starters, jingles have gotten shorter and shorter over the years, morphing from 30-second songs to what are sometimes called âmnemonics,â or short sonic tags like the Netflix tudum and Liberty Mutualâs âLiberty, Liberty, Liiiberty, Liiiberty.â (Liberty Mutualâs CMO, Jenna Lebel, told me that they originally tested a version of the song that repeated liberty six times, but they felt that was a bit much and cut it down to four, which went over well.) Sonically, jinglesâI just canât get myself to call them mnemonicsâare simple. Timothy D. Taylor, an ethnomusicologist at UCLA who wrote a history of advertising music, used to keep a database of every jingle he came across, labeled by genre. âMany of them were written like they were a song for children,â he said. âThe very simplicity of them was part of the reason they stick in your head.â
With all of these limitations, jingle writers focus on measurable, proven qualities. âIn many ways products like Suno think about music the same way that advertising agencies doâthrough words about mood and genre, and through references to existing artists,â Ravi Krishnaswami, a musicologist who studies AI music at Brown and a commercial-music composer himself, wrote to me in an email. Agencies might give composers a brief asking for a song that feels âcurious,â âplayful,â âwitty,â and âquirky,â for instanceâthe types of descriptors you might see on a Spotify playlistâand then gauge which jingles best evoke these emotions in listeners. In theory, AI could be programmed to create a ditty with these qualitiesâperhaps producing something as catchy as âLike a good neighbor, State Farm is thereâ or âI am stuck on Band-Aidâ (both of which were composed by Barry Manilow, by the way).
But good commercial music needs to target peopleâs emotions, and AI music is bad at doing that, at least for now. In one analysis by Stephen Arnold Music and SoundOut, a music-testing company, AI generally was not able to deliver tracks that matched the emotions requested by the prompters. Krishnaswami told me that, although AI can produce good jingles right now, âIâm not sure about âgreatâ yet.â
I could see what he meant. When I played around with one generator, it gave me nice-enough music for B-roll in a cat-food commercial. But could AI give me something as delightfully weird as the Meow Mix song? No. I asked for a jingle I could use for a coffee company, hoping it could give me something like the Folgers theme. Instead, it gave me âBrewed Bliss,â in which a store-brand Jason Mraz sang of âcoffee magic in your soul.â
Maybe lyrics arenât its thing, I thought. (We canât all be Barry Manilow.) So I asked the generator for a series of five notes a coffee company could use as its sonic tag. It then gave me a 2-minute-27-second song called âCoffee Chime.â A soprano with Broadway-caliber diction narrated the song as it played, actually singing aloud the words âA five-note sequence that feels warm and inviting,â and âa rising pitch on a xylophone, ending with a soft chime that lingers, evoking the sound of a spoon stirring in a cup.â I tried to make it clear that I wanted something under five seconds that did not include self-narrating lyrics. But I just got another long song, more âsound of a spoon.â
Many of these jingles were ridiculous; many were deeply average. But the real problem was that I couldnât remember any of them. A good jingle needs to stick with youâLiberty Mutual chose its melody because people could sing it back after hearing it only once, Lebel told me. Repetition is the main way a song can become an earworm, but it also needs to be the right amount of familiar and unusual, Bradley Vines, the director of neuroscience for the consumer-intelligence company NielsenIQ, told me. Memorable songs have a common melodic shapeâthink of how many pop songsâ melodies rise and fall in pitch, forming an arch (so does the tune of McDonaldâs âIâm Lovinâ Itâ). But earworms usually have a surprising change in pitch, like that satisfying jump in the âLike a good neighborâ melody. âGiven that a driver for earworms is the unexpected, an AI system trained on existing earworms may not be able to create a new oneâ by following what has worked before, Vines said.
The music I generated may have been forgettable because it was either too weird (no common melodic shape) or too bland (no surprising interval or rhythm changes). But research also indicates that people just donât remember AI-generated content as well as the kind made by humans. Vines told me that when NielsenIQ showed people AI- and human-created advertisements, they couldnât reliably distinguish between the two. However, when they looked at AI commercials, the memory systems in their brains were less active. âThere was something that wasnât as familiar and relatable in those ads,â he said. âThere is something at the level of the nonconscious that still distinguishesâ between human-created and AI-generated media.
Which isnât to say that advertisers arenât using the technologyâthey do, but mostly for demos, not the finished product. A composer who is not much of a singer might send a sample track with AI vocals on it. Or someone testing out whether to go with a band or a string quartet for a commercial track could easily try out both, before hiring people for the real advertisement. Part of this is pragmatic: Companies may be afraid of a lawsuit if, say, their prompt for âan upbeat 1960s British rock song with a 12-string Rickenbackerâ produces a jingle that sounds too much like the Beatles. âI donât see anybody going, Hey, AI, write me the next Coca-Cola jingle,â Jonathan Wolfert, the president of JAM Creative Productions, told me. (Ironically, Coca-Colaâs current holiday campaign features AI-generated visualsâbut even so, the company has emphasized that the music in the ads was performed by humans.)
Whenever music generation gets good enough, companies will be ready. Liberty Mutual uses AI for voice, music, and sound effects in the early-stage commercials it shows focus groups. Then, it uses humans for the final versions. For now, people generally feel like AI-generated ads are inauthentic, but Lebel told me that Liberty Mutual has been testing them âwith the hopes to someday incorporate that in market.â
Many people I spoke with said that a great jingle, or any great music, needs a âhuman touch.â When Iâd ask them to define it, though, the consensus seemed to be, âI know it when I hear it.â But maybe itâs simple: AI is not a human. It does not exist in the sensory world, and itâs not exposed to the inspiration that daily life provides. Joni Mitchell wrote âNathan La Franeerâ about a real New York City cab driver who took her to the airport. Paul McCartney got the image for Eleanor Rigbyâs âface that she keeps in a jarâ from his motherâs cold cream. And the name Rigby, he saw on a sign while visiting Bristol.
Jingles are not Song to a Seagull or Revolver, but the best ones come from those same incalculable leaps of the creative mind. I thought of David Lucas. Now 88, Lucas was a prolific jingle writer from the â60s through the â90s, but by night, he was a rock musician. He was a producer on Blue Ăyster Cultâs hit â(Donât Fear) the Reaper,â and was the one who suggested the song needed a cowbell. (He thought nothing of it until decades later, when SNL did an entire sketch about it, and needs more cowbell entered the cultural lexicon.)
Lucas was once in a meeting about Fanta. He told me about passing bottles of it around with the other advertising guys, laughing, having a good time. As he got into a cab to head back to his studio, he thought, Well, that was fun. And then he got the lyric âItâs fun to be thirsty.â Itâs a weird lineâwho likes to be thirsty? Not me. But after weeks of listening to jingles generated by AI, none of them stuck in my brain like Lucasâs Fanta jingle, which I had heard only a single time. And I doubt that AIâor most humans, for that matterâwould have thought that â(Donât Fear) the Reaperâ needed more cowbell.